1968 Mazda 1000 vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 1999 Seat Cordoba is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Seat Cordoba is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Seat Cordoba (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda 1000 | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 1000 | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 987 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 77 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2520 mm |
