1968 Mazda 1000 vs. 2004 MCC Smart
To start off, 2004 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,168 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mazda 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 MCC Smart (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda 1000 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2004 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 MCC Smart (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda 1000 | 2004 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | 1000 | Smart |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1168 cc | 696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 735 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2370 mm |