1968 Mazda 1000 vs. 2007 Renault Clio
To start off, 2007 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2007 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Renault Clio (197 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Renault Clio (292 Nm @ 5550 RPM) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (77 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2007 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda 1000 | 2007 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 1000 | Clio |
Year Released | 1968 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 987 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 77 Nm | 292 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1770 mm |