1968 Mazda 1000 vs. 2010 Opel Combo
To start off, 2010 Opel Combo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda 1000 | 2010 Opel Combo | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | 1000 | Combo |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1168 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 126 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 52 L |