1968 Mazda 1000 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1968 Mazda 1000. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda 1000. (94 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda 1000 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | 1000 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1168 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 94 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3800 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2685 mm |