1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1951 Toyota SA
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Toyota SA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Toyota SA would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1951 Toyota SA. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1951 Toyota SA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Toyota SA weights approximately 230 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1951 Toyota SA | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Cosmo | SA |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 995 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 27 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
