1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1952 Simca Aronde
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1952 Simca Aronde. (41 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1952 Simca Aronde. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 20 kg more than 1952 Simca Aronde. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1952 Simca Aronde | |
| Make | Mazda | Simca |
| Model | Cosmo | Aronde |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 41 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 39 L |
