1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1959 Skoda Octavia
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Skoda Octavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Skoda Octavia would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1959 Skoda Octavia. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1959 Skoda Octavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 16 kg more than 1959 Skoda Octavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1959 Skoda Octavia | |
| Make | Mazda | Skoda |
| Model | Cosmo | Octavia |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 924 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1610 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
