1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 2,779 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk weights approximately 360 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1959 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
Make | Mazda | Studebaker |
Model | Cosmo | Sky Hawk |
Year Released | 1968 | 1959 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2779 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2980 mm |