1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1963 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Mercury Monterey weights approximately 836 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1963 Mercury Monterey | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercury |
| Model | Cosmo | Monterey |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 6964 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1776 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 3050 mm |
