1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1964 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1964 Volkswagen 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1964 Volkswagen 1500 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cosmo | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 52 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 40 L |
