1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1977 Mazda 121
To start off, 1977 Mazda 121 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,615 cc (2 cylinders), 1977 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Mazda 121 (114 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Mazda 121 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Mazda 121 weights approximately 260 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Mazda 121 (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1977 Mazda 121 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1977 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Cosmo | 121 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2615 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2520 mm |