1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1980 Opel Manta
To start off, 1980 Opel Manta is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Opel Manta weights approximately 50 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1980 Opel Manta | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | Cosmo | Manta |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 990 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2530 mm |
