1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 1980 TVR 3000 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 TVR 3000 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Mazda | TVR |
Model | Cosmo | 3000 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2290 mm |