1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1982 Mazda 323
To start off, 1982 Mazda 323 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 323. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 90 kg more than 1982 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 323. (80 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1982 Mazda 323 | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | Cosmo | 323 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1071 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 80 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2370 mm |
