1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1986 Honda Integra
To start off, 1986 Honda Integra is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Honda Integra (113 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1986 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Mazda | Honda |
| Model | Cosmo | Integra |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4285 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2450 mm |
