1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1986 Peugeot 504
To start off, 1986 Peugeot 504 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Peugeot 504 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Peugeot 504 (100 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Peugeot 504 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Peugeot 504 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1986 Peugeot 504 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | Cosmo | 504 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1971 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2750 mm |
