1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1989 Holden Gemini
To start off, 1989 Holden Gemini is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1989 Holden Gemini. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1989 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 80 kg more than 1989 Holden Gemini. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Holden Gemini, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1989 Holden Gemini. (117 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1989 Holden Gemini. 1989 Holden Gemini has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1989 Holden Gemini will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1989 Holden Gemini | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | Cosmo | Gemini |
Year Released | 1968 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1471 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 117 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2410 mm |