1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1990 Peugeot 309
To start off, 1990 Peugeot 309 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1990 Peugeot 309. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1990 Peugeot 309. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 90 kg more than 1990 Peugeot 309. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Peugeot 309, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Peugeot 309. (88 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Peugeot 309.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1990 Peugeot 309 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | Cosmo | 309 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1118 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 53 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2480 mm |
