1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer (111 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 95 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer (137 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1995 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Mazda | Mitsubishi |
Model | Cosmo | Lancer |
Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 111 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1480 mm |