1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Rover 200. (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | Cosmo | 200 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2510 mm |