1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1998 Acura TL
To start off, 1998 Acura TL is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura TL (200 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1998 Acura TL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | Cosmo | TL |
Year Released | 1968 | 1998 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2840 mm |