1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 1999 Noble M10
To start off, 1999 Noble M10 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Noble M10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Noble M10 (168 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Noble M10 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Noble M10 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Noble M10 (220 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 1999 Noble M10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 1999 Noble M10 | |
| Make | Mazda | Noble |
| Model | Cosmo | M10 |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 168 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1170 mm |
