1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 107 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 566 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Cosmo | Tribute |
Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 62 L |