1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2005 Toyota Sparky
To start off, 2005 Toyota Sparky is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1968 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (94 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2005 Toyota Sparky. (86 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota Sparky. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Sparky weights approximately 130 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 2005 Toyota Sparky is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Sparky will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Sparky. (130 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Sparky.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2005 Toyota Sparky | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | Cosmo | Sparky |
Year Released | 1968 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 86 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1900 mm |