1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2006 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Daewoo Tocsa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa (153 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Daewoo Tocsa (237 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2006 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2006 Daewoo Tocsa | |
| Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
| Model | Cosmo | Tocsa |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 133 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2700 mm |
