1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2009 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2009 Subaru Outback is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,997 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Outback (242 HP) has 148 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Outback weights approximately 495 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Outback (215 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Subaru Outback will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. 2009 Subaru Outback has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Subaru Outback will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2009 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | Cosmo | Outback |
Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 2997 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | boxer |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 227 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |