1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera
To start off, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (256 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera (322 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Alfa Romeo Brera | |
Make | Mazda | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Cosmo | Brera |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3195 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 322 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1380 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |