1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (205 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 911 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Wrangler (325 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mazda | Jeep |
Model | Cosmo | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 205 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1851 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4161 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 2103 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2423 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 70 L |