1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 BMW 118

To start off, 2012 BMW 118 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW 118 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 118 (143 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 118 should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW 118 weights approximately 400 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 118 (190 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 118 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Mazda Cosmo 2012 BMW 118
Make Mazda BMW
Model Cosmo 118
Year Released 1968 2012
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1964 cc 1995 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 94 HP 143 HP
Torque 133 Nm 190 Nm
Torque RPM 3500 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 940 kg 1340 kg
Vehicle Length 4150 mm 4239 mm
Vehicle Width 1600 mm 1748 mm
Vehicle Height 1170 mm 1421 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 51 L