1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2012 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2012 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan X-Trail (148 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 2012 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2012 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Cosmo | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1964 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 148 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4640 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 65 L |
