1968 Mazda Cosmo vs. 2013 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2013 Cadillac SRX is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac SRX (304 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac SRX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac SRX (359 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 226 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Cosmo. 2013 Cadillac SRX has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda Cosmo has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda Cosmo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac SRX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Cosmo | 2013 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | Cosmo | SRX |
Year Released | 1968 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1964 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 304 HP |
Torque | 133 Nm | 359 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1170 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |