1968 Mazda Luce vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1968 Mazda Luce is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda Luce (70 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda Luce should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Toyota Master RR weights approximately 160 kg more than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Luce | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Luce | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 75 L |
