1968 Mazda Luce vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 1995 Nissan AA-X is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 1,490 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Nissan AA-X weights approximately 110 kg more than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Because 1968 Mazda Luce is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Luce. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Nissan AA-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Luce | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | Luce | AA-X |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2530 mm |
