1968 Mazda Luce vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile SS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Because 1968 Mazda Luce is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda Luce. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Luce | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Mazda | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Luce | SS |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 3791 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 202 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 118 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1900 mm |
