1968 Mazda Luce vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mazda Luce is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Mazda Luce weights approximately 85 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda Luce (152 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1968 Mazda Luce will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda Luce | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Mazda | MCC |
Model | Luce | Smart |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 152 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1060 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 47 L |