1968 Mazda Luce vs. 2003 Toyota Condor

To start off, 2003 Toyota Condor is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,438 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota Condor (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (70 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota Condor should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Toyota Condor weights approximately 345 kg more than 1968 Mazda Luce. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Toyota Condor (196 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Luce. (118 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Toyota Condor will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Luce.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Mazda Luce 2003 Toyota Condor
Make Mazda Toyota
Model Luce Condor
Year Released 1968 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1490 cc 2438 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 70 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 118 Nm 196 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1150 kg 1495 kg
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2660 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 70 L