1968 Mazda Luce vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda Luce. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda Luce would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1968 Mazda Luce. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda Luce. (152 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda Luce.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda Luce | 2010 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | Luce | Epica |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 152 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2700 mm |
