1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 1976 Subaru 1400
To start off, 1976 Subaru 1400 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Subaru 1400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda R-100 | 1976 Subaru 1400 | |
Make | Mazda | Subaru |
Model | R-100 | 1400 |
Year Released | 1968 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1963 cc | 1361 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |