1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 1987 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 1987 Ford Aerostar is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,302 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1987 Ford Aerostar. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 605 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Aerostar (160 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm). This means 1987 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 1987 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | R-100 | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1987 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 2302 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 88 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 3030 mm |
