1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 1996 Nissan Cefiro
To start off, 1996 Nissan Cefiro is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Nissan Cefiro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 625 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda R-100 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda R-100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda R-100 | 1996 Nissan Cefiro | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | R-100 | Cefiro |
Year Released | 1968 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1963 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |