1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 1997 Nissan El Grand
To start off, 1997 Nissan El Grand is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 3,299 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan El Grand is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 1165 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 1997 Nissan El Grand | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | R-100 | El Grand |
| Year Released | 1968 | 1997 |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 3299 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1970 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1950 mm |
