1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2003 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2003 Nissan Cima is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 4,500 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Nissan Cima weights approximately 965 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda R-100 | 2003 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | R-100 | Cima |
Year Released | 1968 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1963 cc | 4500 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |