1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2004 Audi TT
To start off, 2004 Audi TT is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Audi TT (148 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Audi TT weights approximately 535 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Audi TT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Audi TT (195 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100. 2004 Audi TT has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda R-100 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda R-100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Audi TT will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 2004 Audi TT | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | R-100 | TT |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 1780 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2430 mm |
