1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK (522 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz CK | |
| Make | Mazda | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | R-100 | CK |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 270 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2440 mm |
