1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | R-100 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
