1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 3008. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 3008.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Mazda R-100. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Compare all specifications:
1968 Mazda R-100 | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | R-100 | 3008 |
Year Released | 1968 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1963 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1837 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1639 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2613 mm |