1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2011 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2011 Opel Meriva is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2011 Opel Meriva. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda R-100 (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Opel Meriva. (130 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1968 Mazda R-100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 2011 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | R-100 | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 99 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
