1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2012 Buick Regal

To start off, 2012 Buick Regal is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick Regal (220 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1968 Mazda R-100. (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1968 Mazda R-100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick Regal weights approximately 860 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick Regal (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mazda R-100. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mazda R-100. 2012 Buick Regal has automatic transmission and 1968 Mazda R-100 has manual transmission. 1968 Mazda R-100 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Buick Regal will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1968 Mazda R-100 2012 Buick Regal
Make Mazda Buick
Model R-100 Regal
Year Released 1968 2012
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1963 cc 2000 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 110 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 7000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 135 Nm 352 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed shiftable automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 805 kg 1665 kg
Vehicle Length 3840 mm 4831 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1857 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1483 mm
Wheelbase Size 2270 mm 2738 mm