1968 Mazda R-100 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mazda R-100 (135 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (115 Nm). This means 1968 Mazda R-100 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1968 Mazda R-100 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | R-100 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1968 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1963 cc | 1206 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 110 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2525 mm |
